Why Komen Really Is the Bad Guy Here
It's one thing to say you're fighting breast cancer and something else entirely to actually fight breast cancer
3rd of February, 2012 · 4 Comments
Susan G. Komen for the Cure is is the best known, largest and best-funded breast cancer organization in the United States. Komen is responsible for the pink ribbon. If you buy Yoplait yogurt with a pink lid, the pink lid is there because of Komen. The organization does a lot of races to raise money, and I once wrote an article about a woman who, after beating breast cancer, went to one of them to raise money.
Planned Parenthood is an organization that focuses primarily on women’s health. According to the Washington Post, only about 3% of what Planned Parenthood does is abortions, most of the rest of it being STI testing and treatment, contraception solutions, and cancer screening. But right-wing nut-jobs don’t have a rich history of looking at the whole picture and routinely. They do have a rich history of bombing abortion clinics though.
And all is not well in paradise. Komen used to donate a ton of money to Planned Parenthood, but stopped. Why? Ostensibly because Planned Parenthood is under federal investigation. But mostly, it seems to me, because Komen hired Karen Handel to be its new vice president of policy at Komen. Handel once ran for governor of Georgia promising to defund Planned Parenthood in that state.
(Quick aside on that: it really seems like the same logic as the abortion bombers to me. Kill an abortion doctor, save hundreds or thousands of unborn babies. Defund Planned Parenthood and all its cancer screening and STI treatment and contraceptives, and more women will die of cancer and STIs, meaning less abortions. So losing contraceptives is sort of the equivalent of killing a doctor. It’s a necessary evil to do the most good. Makes sense.)
Handel also retweeted and then deleted a pretty effed tweet by Jade Morey.
In addition, despite the new policy of not funding organizations under federal investigation, Komen is still funding Penn State University. Penn State, you’ll remember, is under investigation over the sexual assault scandal involving Jerry Sandusky, rapist of children.
Further lending credence to my disbelief, three key players at Komen have resigned in protest.
But all isn’t lost. In direct response to Komen, New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg donated a quarter of a million dollars to Planned Parenthood and he best summed up the entire situation:
Politics have no place in health care. Breast cancer screening saves lives, and hundreds of thousands of women rely on Planned Parenthood for access to care. We should be helping women access that care, not placing barriers in their way.
And he’s not the only one. Mule Design’s Mike Monteiro, simply by calling people to action on Twitter, is responsible for raising more than $6,000, $50 at a time, since yesterday.
Now, Brinker may be telling the truth and the decision truly wasn’t politically motivated. But, again, that’s not how it seems to me. Between the questionable hire, the inconsistent grants, the staffers quitting, and the hack-job PR, it’s clear to me that Komen, due to political pressure, has betrayed its core values.
I have decided to boycott anything with a pink ribbon and donate $10 per month to Planned Parenthood. I wish I could do more, but I’m poor.
Still, $10′s $10, and that’s more than Komen’s doing.



Hillary
on Friday, February 3rd, 2012 at 1:18 pm
WELL SAID!!!!!! I have a $3500 yearly deductible on my insurance, since my boss changed it 3 years ago from $500 (just in time for Ella’s delivery, tyvm). I have put off having a mammogram since she was born, because of $$ issues. I had NO idea P.P. did mammograms. Now, I’ll be looking for one nearby (is there one in SLO?), so I can get one there. We too are poor & just barely getting by. This organization is SORELY needed, especially in these Economic Times!
Aaron
on Friday, February 3rd, 2012 at 6:25 pm
It’s worth noting that Komen funds about $733K of Planned Parenthood’s $1 billion budget. That’s less than 0.1 percent. Komen cutting off funding (and they reversed course anyway) wasn’t going to do much real damage… AKA it was more bark than bite. Don’t let that get in the way of a few good anti-GOP rants, though.
Creig P. Sherburne
on Sunday, February 5th, 2012 at 9:00 am
I never put a dollar value on how “bad” Komen is. I don’t think the actual dollar value has anything to do with it. The problem is politics in health care. The problem is Komen bowing to, yes, right-wing pressure. And that pressure is traceable. http://articles.latimes.com/2012/feb/01/news/la-heb-komen-planned-parenthood-congressional-investigation-20120201
There are plenty of political things I’ve written about that have nothing to do with the GOP. This does. Dismissing it as an “anti-GOP rant” or trying to put a dollar value on the damage doesn’t mean the GOP isn’t partially to blame and doesn’t mean that damage is negligible.
Aaron
on Sunday, February 5th, 2012 at 12:02 pm
The true damage really is negligible, though, considering what small potatoes the Komen funding really is. A much larger percentage, about a third, of Planned Parenthood’s funding comes from tax dollars, thanks to a law signed by evil Republican Richard Nixon. Again, the bark is worse than the bite. Cancer screenings won’t end because of this. STI checks won’t end because of this. Women won’t die because of this. A person going to a Planned Parenthood clinic who hadn’t heard of any of this news would not notice a difference. If fear isn’t a valid political tactic for Republicans to use, then it shouldn’t be valid for Democrats to use fear either.
As for the Penn State thing: The article linked isn’t telling us the whole story that we need. It states that the Penn State grant was awarded in 2008 and is $7.5 million over five years. It does not state whether the grants to Planned Parenthood are on an ongoing basis, like they are to Penn State, or whether it’s a new grant every year. That’s a big question to answer. We also aren’t told if Komen’s policy is to not award new grants or to yank already-approved grants.